Content Knowledge & Expertise

Performance Levels

Displays extensive content knowledge of all the subjects she or he teaches and closely related subjects.

Integrates learning objectives with other disciplines, content areas and real-world experience.

Consistently anticipates possible student misunderstandings and proactively develops teaching techniques to mitigate concerns.

Consistently provides opportunities for students to use different types of thinking (e.g., analytical, practical, creative and research-based).

Sequences instruction that allows students to understand how the lesson fits within the structure of the discipline, the state standards, related content and within real-world scenarios.

Conveys a depth of content knowledge that allows for differentiated explanations.

Integrates learning objectives with other disciplines and real-world experiences.

Anticipates possible student misunderstandings and proactively develops teaching techniques to mitigate concerns.

Regularly provides opportunities for students to use different types of thinking (e.g., analytical, practical, creative and research-based).

Sequences instruction that allows students to understand how the lesson fits within the structure of the discipline and the state standards.

Conveys accurate content knowledge in multiple contexts.

Integrates learning objectives with other disciplines.

Anticipates possible student misunderstandings.

Provides opportunities for students to use different types of thinking (e.g., analytical, practical, creative and research-based).

Accurately reflects how the lesson fits within the structure of the discipline and the state standards.

Conveys accurate content knowledge.

Sometimes integrates learning objectives with other disciplines.

Sometimes anticipates possible student misunderstandings.

Sometimes provides opportunities for students to use different types of thinking (e.g., analytical, practical, creative and research-based).

Conveys inaccurate content knowledge that leads to student confusion.

Rarely integrates learning objectives with other disciplines.

Does not anticipate possible student misunderstandings.

Provides few opportunities for students to use different types of thinking (e.g., analytical, practical, creative and research-based).

Student Centered Teacher Centered

Evidence

  • Conferences and Conversations with the Teacher
  • Formal Observations/Walkthroughs
  • Student Growth Processes
  • Analysis of Student Data

Reflective Questions

These reflective questions are designed to support reflection on classroom practices, gather relevant data, and make necessary adjustments to increase lesson effectiveness. Base the responses to these questions on high-quality evidence.

  • What evidence exists that differentiated explanations were needed?
  • How did students interact with the differentiated explanations?
  • Which teaching techniques were most successful in alleviating misconceptions?
  • How successful were students in demonstrating different types of thinking?
  • Which type of thinking was most beneficial to ensure students mastered the content?
  • How successful were students in making connections to other disciplines or real-world experiences?
  • How did providing students with reflection opportunities impact their learning?
  • What strategies showed student learning was supported?
  • What new understandings were made about the content?
  • What new understandings were made about the students?
About Tessie Have feedback?