Monitor & Adjust

Performance Levels

Systematically gathers input from students in order to monitor and adjust instruction, activities or pacing to respond to differences in student needs.

Adjusts instruction and activities to maintain student engagement.

Uses discrete and explicit checks for understanding through questioning and academic feedback.

Utilizes input from students in order to monitor and adjust instruction, activities and pacing to respond to differences in student needs.

Adjusts instruction and activities to maintain student engagement.

Continually checks for understanding through purposeful questioning and academic feedback.

Consistently invites input from students in order to monitor and adjust instruction and activities.

Adjusts instruction and activities to maintain student engagement.

Monitors student behavior and responses for engagement and understanding.

Sometimes utilizes input from students in order to monitor and adjust instruction and activities.

Adjusts some instruction within a limited range.

Sees student behavior but misses some signs of disengagement.

Is aware of most student responses but misses some clues of misunderstanding.

Rarely utilizes input from students in order to monitor and adjust instruction and activities.

Persists with instruction or activities that do not engage students.

Generally does not link student behavior and responses with student engagement and understanding.

Makes no attempts to engage students who appear disengaged or disinterested.

Student Centered Teacher Centered

Evidence

  • Conferences and Conversations with the Teacher
  • Formal Observations/Walkthroughs
  • Classroom Artifacts
  • Student Growth Processes
  • Analysis of Student Data

Reflective Questions

These reflective questions are designed to support reflection on classroom practices, gather relevant data, and make necessary adjustments to increase lesson effectiveness. Base the responses to these questions on high-quality evidence.

  • What impact did instructional adjustments have on student success?
  • Which techniques were most successful in determining student understanding?
  • What types of questions were most impactful on active engagement?
  • How did frequent checks for understanding throughout the lesson impact student performance?
  • When in the lesson cycle was feedback provided to students?
  • How was feedback used to make an instructional adjustment?
  • How successful was peer-to-peer feedback at ensuring students performed at mastery?
  • How did students routinely contribute to and take action on feedback?
  • What impact did the examples of successful student work have on the learning outcome?
About Tessie Have feedback?